COMPARISON

recv vs NowPayments: Control vs Convenience

A detailed comparison of two popular crypto payment solutions. Choose the one that fits your scaling needs.

Criterion
NowPayments
recv
01

Payout Model

NowPayments

Internal balance system. You need to manually withdraw or wait for automated payout cycles.

recv

Atomic payouts. Every transaction hits your wallet as soon as it is confirmed on-chain.

02

Commission

NowPayments

Pricing and network charges follow the provider's current published terms.

recv

0% commission. Only pay your fixed subscription and standard network gas fees.

03

Integration

NowPayments

Proprietary API and standard plugins. Focus on generic e-commerce platforms.

recv

Developer-first protocol. Optimized for high-throughput SaaS, Telegram Mini Apps, and custom builds.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

What is the main difference between recv and NowPayments?

NowPayments uses an internal balance model where you withdraw or wait for payout cycles. recv is non-custodial: every confirmed transaction lands directly in your own wallet on-chain, with no platform balance in between.

Does recv charge turnover fees like NowPayments?

recv uses a fixed subscription with zero turnover fees, so costs stay predictable as volume grows instead of scaling with every transaction.

Which networks does recv support?

recv supports TON (native and USDT), TRON (TRC-20 USDT), Solana, Base, Arbitrum, and BSC, with a single API, signed webhooks, and hosted checkout across all of them.

Ready to upgrade your infrastructure?

Join forward-thinking companies that choose recv for secure, non-custodial processing.